jump to navigation

The (Al) Gore-y Reality of Global Warming, er, Climate Change December 8, 2009

Posted by Sanity in Environment, Politics, reform, research, science.
Tags: , , , ,
1 comment so far

EnvironMENTAList or EnvironmentaLOST

The truth is that we are all being (pressure-)treated like we have sap for brains.  Many who care about the environment do have good intentions, but fail to see there are things bigger than the forest … smaller too, but more on that later.

First, in case you missed the memo, “global warming” is an overused term that has failed to deliver when people are freezing their butts off.  (Maybe if we had lost the Cold War, there wouldn’t have been any Global Warming – never mind).  So, now they refer to it as “Climate Change”.

This article is about reminding us to find a balance in all things.  There are specific and obvious problems that I support fighting, but we need to be aware of the tactics that are spoiling any good work being done.  Some people are old enough to remember smog, leaded gasoline, and the commercials with the Indian shedding a tear at all the litter and waste.  We need to remember the areas we have and can make progress in, and we need to admit other areas that have “lost their way” and why.  So let’s go over some tactics and loss of focus that led us to here.

1.     Aim farther than your target – There are those that push WAY past the real target that we should shoot for.  The reasoning is that compromise and ground lost from the cost of interim battles that are lost will bring us to where we really should be.  The problem is that the tug of war goes both ways.  The more extreme one side pulls, the other side goes farther the other way.  Both sides think the other will lose credibility by looking stupid, but they both end up looking like children.  It slows the real progress we need.

2.     The ends justify the means – Again, both sides do this, thinking that some damage is inevitable to either make progress or make the other side look bad.  We do not solve problems by blocking technology from happening, but we absolutely need to reasonably protect what we have while trying to find that next ‘breakthrough’.  John D. Rockefeller was a pioneer of industry that many would focus jealousy-based bias against for making so much profit, but he created 300 products out of the waste produced from refining oil.  He didn’t just care about profit.  He went the extra step to find more and more products even from the ‘waste’ of his primary business.

3.     Lack of ‘Emergency’ desperation – It is really hard to get people motivated without a dire emergency to prove why we need to do something.  Many people are too lazy to turn off automatic sprinkler systems when it is raining.  We throw away so much food because we have it in abundance.  And litter will eventually blow into someone else’s yard.  No one would have really done a massive overhaul of our national security organizations before 9/11/2001.  Without those emergencies, some individuals/groups are guilty of “creating” emergencies in one fashion or another.  Another fact is that the more money we spend and the faster we spend it on fighting to clean up the “damage”, the less accountability we place on companies to be responsible in the first place.

4.     Corruption hijacks the cause – There is certainly proof that people will jump on the money train.  Research and development laboratories would rather keep funding for what they are doing and that can push them to expand the scope of things to justify their existence.  Their jobs are on the line if we make TOO much progress on fighting pollution and holes in the ozone layer.

5.     New “markets” for the “evil corporations” – Has everyone forgotten the industries and corporations we initially blamed for all the pollution and waste?  Suddenly we respond to “green” products and give them more of our money?  To illustrate, let’s pick on the newer light bulbs (and snopes.com – if someone asks, I will do a fuller article on my beef against snopes.com-type sites).  The light bulbs contain mercury, which is a hazardous material.  DO NOT just pick up the broken pieces by hand and vacuum up the small stuff.  DO read the special steps on snopes.com to clean up a broken bulb.  Note:  IF there is not serious amount of a poisonous material, why the need to evacuate the room, avoid breathing while opening a window and shutting off the air conditioner, etc, etc?  How many people are aware of this difference from the old bulbs?  In their rush for gaining a new buck, proper thought and education was avoided on pushing these new bulbs on us.

6.     Keep the “scare factor” going but don’t show TOO much, well, ANY progress – In the past few days alone I have see headlines implying that 1) the slower rising temperatures of the last few years is temporary and 2) the extreme temperatures of the last few years proves … blah blah blah.  The environmental extremists are in an interesting ‘pickle’.  If they show too much progress, there will not be a need to spend so much research money during hard economic times.  If they show no progress, then why are we spending so much money getting nowhere.

7.    “Magic Happens Here” or “God of the Gaps” – With such a large topic, both sides rely a lot on slight of hand on things they have no explanation or no simple explanation for.  Mr. Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth is an example.  The movie made some bold declarations and presentations of “facts” that have been disproved, but to my knowledge Mr. Gore and his followers move forward on their high horse as if there are completely in the right.  They are rushed to say more than they should, to motivate the masses to move faster on “saving the environment”, when they should stick to REAL facts and fight to educate on how important those facts are.

8.    “Aim small, miss small” – Yes, I ripped a quote from Mel Gibson’s “The Patriot”.  At the beginning, I alluded to the “see the forest through the trees” analogy.  There are things larger than the forest, and smaller.  MAYBE one forest is less important to save than other things that help ten other forests grow stronger or faster.  For example, you can continue fighting corporations cutting down one set of trees and maybe that is important, but how many resources have been lost to forest fires throughout the west?  How much pressure is there to fight that problem.  Now, for the “small” part…

We waste our resources.  That’s fact.  There may be less glory in expanding education on recycling, but it is an important step.  Does it help much to blame local problems on “global warming” and throw arms up in despair and leave it at that?  Or are there many things individuals can do preserve our resources?  I used to take more nature hikes.  I would often regret not bringing an extra garbage bag to pick up simple trash.  If beaches are eroding, take a bag of sand with you each time you GO to the beach.  If you throw out food that has passed its “freshness” date, find out if homeless shelters can use it (or the container it is in).  Don’t just blindly buy new “green” products just because some “corporation” SAYS it is green.  Those who do not care about simple, provable examples or of damage we are doing to the environment, they will be no more convinced by Global Warming data.

Be creative and personally do things to save the environment.  Do it, because it is right to do so.

Political Asylum August 31, 2009

Posted by Sanity in Politics, reform, wisdom.
Tags: , , , , ,

HELLO Hello hello ello lo o…

Well, I had an idea this morning and the realization that I haven’t blogged enough or posted on my own site in way too long.  Maybe I’m here by myself.  Sanity is in low supply nowadays and there are not as many brains in government either.

Well, I plan on changing a few things.  Too many remnants of insecurity when I was initially defining my site, but I’ll probably procrastinate again.

No, the subject of today’s post pertains to sad state of politics in this country.  The Democrats are not actually any more productive than a year ago when their approval rating was lower than Bush’s. They appear to be more productive because they spend money really fast, but they can’t really improve things overnight like all the campaign rhetoric would have had you believe.  I measure productivity in the ‘effect’ not the number of bills written and passed.  They can completely ignore the Republicans and the Republicans are only busy posturing and attacking and scrambling for scraps of influence.

It doesn’t really matter though because it is no longer about what either party accomplishes.  This country (including the Party’s, the media, the talking heads, and citizens… and non-citizens) are completely focused on bad mouthing the other side.  Liberals vs. Conservatives.  Far-left loons vs. Right-wing extremists.  Neo-this, neo-that. Blame Bush, Blame Clinton.  If the “Left” proposed the idea/solution, then the “Right” must oppose it, vice versa, etc, etc.

I am tired of it.  I’m not the only one, but I’m going to re-introduce the concept of a new direction, and to continue the working analogy of direction, I declare myself to be an Upist.  Everyone talks about progress, moving forward, hope and change.  That’s why I chose “Up”.  I want to raise the expectation of government to work for EVERYONE, not just be an avenue for abuse, corruption and finding someone else to blame, punish or pay for things.

The mascot for this new Party/direction is the Eagle (or maybe the Falcon – someone who understands and agrees with my point and is more of an expect on birds can refine which features/characteristics fit better).

Now since there are always two sides and I don’t mean to be UP-ity, the “Down-ers” can still be a positive part of the solution and be “Down to Earth” or whatever completes the picture.  No single outlook will fit every facet of society nor make everyone happy.  It is about working together.  It is about growing and working together.  Different methods work and different concerns exist at different levels of society.  There has to be communication in BOTH directions (Up and Down) of the levels of society.  The safest example I can give without starting a political fight, hopefully, would be in agriculture.  Individual farmers need to know what crops are in demand but need to have a way to balance profit so everyone doesn’t plant one crop and prevent anyone from profitting.

One of the things I wish to communicate over time is specific examples of how we argue about things that “miss the mark”.  There are problems and there are causes of those problems and then there are problems with the same way we try to solve all problems.  If I have time, national healthcare is a great example since it provides so many problems with it.  Hopefully I will start that thread soon.

Comment, argue, compliment, ramble.  Just help me get the idea going that we don’t have to keep being led by the broken two-party system.